John Becker, CTP, MBA for Union Township Trustee
Donate Now - Click Here!
  • About John
    • Resume
    • Endorsements
    • Letters
  • The Issues
    • Issues at a Glance
    • FAQs
    • Ohio Marriage Penalty
    • The Becker Doctrine
  • Videos
    • Introduction
    • Pro-Life
    • Taxes
    • State Government Spending
    • State Government
    • Second Ammendment
    • Energy
    • Creation/Evolution
    • Donate
  • The Becker Report
    • Current Issue
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising FAQs
    • Fundraising Results
    • Tax Credit FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
June 21 2001

Pro-Choice on Gun Control (June 21, 2001)

Pro-Choice on Gun Control

State Representative Tom Brinkman (R-37) has recently introduced concealed carry legislation (HB 225 — April 24, 2001). His bill is also known as the Personal Protection Act. A competing bill, introduced by Rep. James Aslanides (HB 274), is a more restrictive alternative. Opponents fear that either bill would lead to “wild-west” style shootouts in traffic intersections. Supporters are looking forward to a reduction in crime and an elevation in personal safety and security.

The gun control debate is emotionally charged for many people. Other people view gun ownership and the right-to-carry concealed weapons as a Constitutional right and social responsibility. The latter also site FBI crime statistics, other states experiences, studies, and simple logic to make their case.

Let’s look at the emotional side of the debate first. All of us have seen the televised aftermath of high-profile mass murders. Understandably, these tragedies have led some people to think that guns are bad or even tools of the devil. They would like to see all guns just disappear along with the violence associated with them.

Although I can empathize with their feelings, logic dictates that guns will never go away. And even if they did, crime would soar. Now let’s look at the reasons why:

  • Some 80 million Americans own 250 million guns. If guns were outlawed, a black market resembling the drug trade would quickly develop. Demand always creates supply (price controls not withstanding).
  • In the 44 states with right-to-carry laws, murders fell 8.5%, rapes fell by 5.2%, aggravated assaults fell by 7%, and robberies fell by 3% (Ohio is one of six states without any right-to-carry protections.)
  • Guns are used to protect life and property over two million times per year. Would-be robbery and rape victims are twice as likely to foil an attacker simply by being armed

What about those dire warnings about “wild-west” style shootouts in traffic intersections issued by those who are against right-to-carry protection? The answer is simple: It has never happened. There has never been a documented case, where a citizen licensed to carry a concealed weapon, has used that weapon illegally.

My wife enjoys jogging during the early morning hours. She occasionally comes home concerned about a strange man that she saw or something that occurred out of the ordinary. Why is it that my wife is not allowed to have the choice to carry a concealed weapon?

Perhaps we can be considered pro-choice on this issue. By modifying some familiar rhetoric, the following arguments could be made: “After all, this is a private issue between my family, my gunsmith and me.” Some may argue that, “although I may not personally consider carrying a concealed weapon, who am I to impose my morality on others?”

For those people who consider guns to be evil, what would Jesus think? Perhaps we can all agree that the sword is the biblical equivalent to the gun. “He said to them, ‘But now if you have a purse, take it, also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one’” Luke 22:36 (NIV). Why did Jesus tell his apostles to buy a sword if such deadly weapons were evil or tools of the devil?

We can find plenty of Biblical documentation on both sides of this debate. It seems to me that the weapon isn’t the issue, but rather the intentions of its’ user. Will the sword (gun) be used for offensive purposes? Or defensive?

There is one final thought that I would like Governor Taft and the Ohio Legislature to consider: Why can cities ban guns, in clear violation of the Second Amendment; but can’t ban newspapers due to the First Amendment? The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads as follows: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” What part of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” or “shall not be infringed” is so confusing to some people?


John E. Becker

June 21, 2001

Non-Traditional Family – Does anything go? (May 31, 2001) What I would add to the US Bill of Rights (July 2, 2001)

Related Posts

Letters

Guest Column – (October 31, 2012)

Letters

Guest Column – (August 29, 2012)

Letters

Guest Column – (February 19, 2012)

Recent Posts

  • The Becker Report – December 2022
  • The Becker Report – November 2022
  • The Becker Report – October 2022
  • The Becker Report – September 2022
  • The Becker Report – August 2022

Archives

  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • January 2011
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • January 2010
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • January 2006
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • October 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • August 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • December 2002
  • September 2002
  • April 2002
  • December 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • August 2000
  • September 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • February 1999
  • January 1999
  • December 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • December 1997
  • July 1996
  • May 1995
  • April 1995
  • February 1995
  • January 1995
  • September 1994
  • August 1994
  • October 1993
  • April 1993

Pro-Life • Pro-Gun • Lower Taxes • Limited Government.

Paid for by Friends of Becker – All Content Copyright © 2019 Friends of Becker. All right reserved.